Posts Tagged ‘Violence’

Confusion of Guilt with Empathetic Pain

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

This post is practical in nature. It is based on observation, not necessity. And its point is not that pacifism is wrong (although it is), but that pacifism’s critique of just violence is based on a confused response to emotion.
Israeli Missile Attack on HamasThe international pressure on Israel to move toward a cease-fire with Hamas is a good example of a basic confusion which promotes pacifism over real peace. One of the reasons pacifists mis-characterize all violence as wrong—or as anti-Christian—is related to the reason much violence is wrong. That is, the empathy and altruism built into humanity produce uncomfortable emotions and a corresponding awareness of guilt when a person behaves cruelly. By human (and Humean) nature, people who experience the emotion (empathetic pain or grief) associate it with (more…)

Sphere: Related Content

Hauerwas in the CTR: A, umm, Responsive Reading

Monday, October 20th, 2008

The Criswell Theological ReviewIn the Fall 2008 CTR, Stanley Hauerwas defends his pacifism. The following is simply a section-by-section and sometimes paragraph-by-paragraph response as I read the work. His sections are on the idealism of realism, the nation (or war) as church, and pacifism as realism.

“The Idealism of Realism”
Paragraph 1: Hauerwas claims that critics of pacifism rely on realism to make their claim. But actually, what’s wrong with pacifism is not that it is not realistic, even though I agree that it is not. The fact that something doesn’t work means only that it doesn’t work, not that it is wrong. What’s wrong with Pacifism is (more…)

Sphere: Related Content

The Fundamental Importance of the Right to Private Property

Thursday, July 10th, 2008

Click for Video News Report“They shoot people in Texas.” Texans are going to start dealing with a reputation for being trigger-happy. A few weeks back a man was no-billed for shooting and killing two men who were burglarizing his neighbor’s home. Now, a 25 year old Garland man has shot and killed a man suspected of climbing onto the roof of his father’s business in order to strip and steal copper from air conditioning units. Reports so far, including one in the Dallas Morning News, indicate the 25 year old will not even face a grand jury for the shooting. DFW’s CBS 11 has a video report on it as well.
Undoubtedly some people will be offended (more…)

Sphere: Related Content

The Great Christian Model Is Not about Pacifism

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

grapes of whatSome of those who acknowledge that violence might be virtuous at certain times and for certain people still hold that it is not right for Christians living out the kingdom in the world today.
There are several problems with that position. It misses the necessarily universal nature of moral judgments, for one (as always, a post for another day). But perhaps the most important problem with that position is that it hinges on a misinterpretation of the model of Christ.
A commendation for those who hold that view is that they have certainly chosen the right figure to follow. In the light of 1 Peter 2:21-24, believers must follow Christ’s example in order to be genuine disciples. (more…)

Sphere: Related Content

Christians and Violence; Cal Thomas and the Dallas Morning News

Tuesday, July 8th, 2008

micA Jerry Johnson Live broadcast from July 2, 2008: A Pasadena man is no-billed for shooting neighbors’ burglars with his shotgun. Is such violence ever acceptable for Christians? One small part of my position on pacifism is here. Also, Cal Thomas discusses why the Dallas Morning News dropped his column, how Obama’s candidacy looks to him, and other issues from a Christian perspective.

Sphere: Related Content

What’s Wrong with Pacifism: It Confuses Contingency with Utility

Friday, June 27th, 2008

The objection to force and violence, whether entirely or only for Christians, is misguided. The nature of God, the role of believers, and the universal nature of ethics all attest to the same thing regarding violence. The argument of this post is one small step among many intended to make clear why pacifism is wrong.
mourning doveThere are some things people do solely for the benefit it brings. A man buys gasoline not because gasoline is good, but because getting where he wants to go really fast and without sweat is good. Gasoline is good only insofar as it is useful for accomplishing another good. That usefulness is called utility. The fact that gasoline is only valuable because of its utility is what makes transitioning to different sources of energy possible–what makes the prospect of non-gasoline-consuming cars which could run just as well as gasoline cars but without petroleum’s side-effects so appealing.
Also, there are some things which are what they are only because other things are what they are. If it is hot outside (more…)

Sphere: Related Content