why postmoderns are conservative, even if they haven’t read that part of the story yet
Tuesday, June 9th, 2009
Post-moderns attempt to escape the narrow confines of a culture defined by the Enlightenment. That attempt includes moving from pure individualism to community, from propositional claims to narrative, from strict rationalism to contentment with inconsistency, from truth to authenticity, and from integrity to transparency. Every one of those moves is surrounded by dangerous cliffs overlooking jagged valley floors. But that discussion is for another day.
The point here is that by making those moves, post-moderns also end up embracing a type of community which is organic and emergent rather then artificially planned, engineered, and executed. There is something about post-modernity which expects the unexpected, and does not believe that air-tight solutions really have all the holes sealed up. So natural pressures and and the choices of individuals acting as part of a community within those pressures creatively emerge into solutions unforeseen by those living within strict rationalistic guidelines.
Interestingly, conservatives share exactly the (more…)
Sphere: Related Content
Someone e-mailed me this picture with the caption, redneck seafood. Since I now have less than half-inch hair, I believe I can use the word “redneck” with some impunity. And I must admit, the appearance is better than the traditional “tube steak” look.
The ideas are simple. But apparently, not very many people have thought of them lately. So here’s a very brief reminder of a very basic concept for as very many people as will read it.
Addressing the current financial sector crisis in America, President Bush made this remark:
This week’s return to school has put back in the forefront the troubles facing many school districts and individual schools. The problems are defined in different ways by different parts of society, but all the symptoms point to poor performance. Students are not learning as they should. Two questions seem inseparable: why, and what to do. They seem inseparable, but they are not. Conventional thinking says that if the reason for poor performance can be discerned (why), then it can be addressed with this or that program or plan (what to do).
There is no real law of unintended consequences. But there might as well be. Whenever people choose acts based on some desired result, they will not only get the desired result (maybe, that is) but also much more. They may or may not foresee it. They may or may not want it. But there will be a consequence, actually many, which they did not intend.
If it is true that where there is smoke there is fire, it is also true that where smoke-bans are expanding, freedoms are burning.
A Jerry Johnson Live broadcast from 


