21st August 2008

Commandment 7: Make Every Rule for Everybody, Including Me

tabletsThis commandment is based on Jesus’ statement in Matthew 7:12, the golden rule. As it turns out, it is extensionally equivalent (sorry for the obfuscation here) to Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative. Many people seem to think the golden rule is about making sure we’re nice to other people so they’ll be nice to us. Hardly.
The point is that if we are going to claim anything is right for us, we must also acknowledge that it is right for everyone else. And if we are going to claim something is wrong for someone else, we must acknowledge that it is wrong for us. As it turns out, this rule is more than coincidentally powerful. It is rationally impossible to believe morality is real and not hold this view. Further, when all is taken into account, it appears that this one rule manages to encompass every moral imperative about living with people.
In traffic, it means one person cannot ethically take the shoulder since the benefit of doing so hinges on everyone else following a rule he has not applied to himself.
In economics, it means there must be a level playing field. That is, there must be a free market, with governmental intrusion only where there is fraud.
Respect for authority, for life, for marriage, for personal property, and for truth itself are all products of this one commandment.

Sphere: Related Content

posted in Culture, Exegesis and Interpretation | 0 Comments

10th June 2008

How Can I Tell If I Am Doing Something Wrong!?

moneyThree words: conflict of interest. There is no more comprehensive or practical tool for identifying ethically indefensible behavior than conflict of interest. Yet its significance is often overlooked and its implications ignored. The New York Times published a story (click here to read it) on June 6, 2008 dealing with exactly this problem in a couple of research professors from Harvard’s medical school. Apparently they have been doing pediatric research on the use of anti-psychotic drugs (yes, anti-psychotic drugs in children, which the Times claims has increased some forty-fold in part because of this research) while failing to report substantial income from the drug companies who benefit from successful test results. Of course, the scientists claim objectivity Read the rest of this entry »

Sphere: Related Content

posted in Culture, Ethics, Philosophy | 1 Comment