17th November 2008

Homo-Sexuality and Hetero-Axiology

posted in Culture, Ethics |

This short post appeals implicitly to the arguments of earlier posts, here and here.
Recent protests around the country reveal something interesting about homosexual values—homosexual axiology. The pronounced premise of the homosexual agenda is a desire for equality. But the concept of equality is far too vague to be valued in and of itself. No one, for instance, believes a victim of rape and a rapist should receive equal consequences for the event which defines them in this example. Such equality would be repugnant to every appreciable set of values. That kind of distinction is what makes equality of opportunity different from equality of distribution, by the way.
But for this point, the equality proposed by those pushing the homosexual agenda is supposed to be about civil rights. But such a claim can only be defended meaningfully if the “right” is rooted in a real “value”, in this case the equal worth of every person (life) and the equal autonomy which ought to be afforded them (liberty). In an abstract, theoretical, ivory-tower kind-of-way, the argument is made that depriving homosexuals of the “right” to marry is depriving them of what should be theirs because they are of equal worth as human beings and ought to have equal liberties. But it is a purely theoretical proposition. In reality (as the two posts referred at the top of this page argue) it is based in no such thing, but rather in a worldview which inherently dismisses, even if unintentionally, (and that acknowledgment is an important one) the very equality supposedly being defended. Why? Because real equality of worth is actually only appreciated when it is based in the recognition that worth is not about being the same as others, but being different from them, a concept factually (and certainly biblically) created in people by the institution of hetero (other) - sexual marriage. Only if “others” share the “same” value can that value be universal.
For those who find this argument too abstract to have any basis in reality, the virulent, hateful, and sometimes physically violent protests of the past few days should provide sufficient empirical evidence that it is, as a matter of fact, perfectly sound.
It would be very odd, otherwise, that people who believe homosexuality is wrong love homosexuals all the while advocating lawfully and peacefully against homosexual marriage, while people who profess to believe that all people should be treated “equally” are treating people other than themselves with anything but equality of worth (hence the video above).
As a side note, those who appreciate this biblical point about worth and equality should also realize that hateful and demeaning behavior toward homosexuals or anyone else whose behavior is wrong or wrong-headed flies in the face of the only values which can justify a defensible stance against wrongdoing.

Sphere: Related Content

This entry was posted on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 5:05 am and is filed under Culture, Ethics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 2 responses to “Homo-Sexuality and Hetero-Axiology”

let me know what you think

  1. 1 On November 18th, 2008, Christopher said:

    Barry, I tried sending this via email but the mail server rejected it (probably for “inappropriate” content).

    Hi, Barry! I called earlier and haven’t decided whether same-sex attraction is a sin or not. Obviously sex outside of marriage, whether between homosexual or heterosexual- is a sin. Adultery and fornication apply to everybody.

    What I do know, however, is that America is not a theocracy. Therefore, it is irrelevant what the Bible says about a particular topic with regard to whether or not it should be considered a law in a secular government. For instance, the Bible is very specific on who to worship and how to worship. However, we agree that government should not be telling us who we can worship or how to worship? That kind of force by law is diametrically opposed to God’s design of freewill/free choice given to men!

    One class of citizen (heterosexual, white, male) should not have benefits unavailable to another class of citizen (homosexual, black, female). That is unfair and is contrary to the principles outlined in our Constitution.

    Our Government should not be dictating our religious lives. They certainly should not be discriminatory because of what the Bible says in regard to homosexuality, as that is a person’s choice and has no consequence in regards to the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of America’s citizens.

    Our laws should protect the life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of its citizens. Anything else is beyond the domain of government.

    I’d like to know why gay marriage should be against the law in a secular society.

    I’m no longer able to speak to you on the phone, so I would be delighted if you could respond to the issues I addressed.

    Thanks so much and may God bless your ministry! :)

  2. 2 On December 6th, 2008, debbie mosley said:

    Barry,

    I would like for you to get Robert jeffress on sometime to talk about this and other topics in his book on Outragious Truths.

Leave a Reply